Structures of Metals: Close Packing.
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Structures of Metals: Close Packing.
Metallic Bonding in the Solid State:
For metals the atoms have low electronegativities; therefore the electrons are delocalized over all the atoms. We can think of the structure of a metal as an arrangement of positive atom cores in a sea of electrons. For a more detailed picture see "Conductivity of Solids".
To maximize the bonding in a metal it makes sense to pack as many atoms around each other as possible, maximize the number of nearest neighbors (called the "coordination number") and minimize the volume.
Close packed layers of atoms.
If we treat the atoms as spheres and consider all the atoms in the solid to be of equal size (as is the case for elemental metals), the most efficient form of packing is the close packed layer. This is illustrated below where it is clear that closepacking of spheres is more efficient than, for example, square packing.
Below on the left is a square packed array compared to the more densely packed close packed array.
Within the square packed layer the coordination # of each atom is 4, in the close packed layer it is 6.
to continue reading clik on the link below
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
For metals the atoms have low electronegativities; therefore the electrons are delocalized over all the atoms. We can think of the structure of a metal as an arrangement of positive atom cores in a sea of electrons. For a more detailed picture see "Conductivity of Solids".
To maximize the bonding in a metal it makes sense to pack as many atoms around each other as possible, maximize the number of nearest neighbors (called the "coordination number") and minimize the volume.
Close packed layers of atoms.
If we treat the atoms as spheres and consider all the atoms in the solid to be of equal size (as is the case for elemental metals), the most efficient form of packing is the close packed layer. This is illustrated below where it is clear that closepacking of spheres is more efficient than, for example, square packing.
Below on the left is a square packed array compared to the more densely packed close packed array.
Within the square packed layer the coordination # of each atom is 4, in the close packed layer it is 6.
to continue reading clik on the link below
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Similar topics
» A member wants to close account. How to do it? Options?
» Spoiler will not close
» Castle Craig Death was "Avoidable"
» Does anyone have domperidone close to Madison, WI?
» [Help] How to close a forumotion Forums?
» Spoiler will not close
» Castle Craig Death was "Avoidable"
» Does anyone have domperidone close to Madison, WI?
» [Help] How to close a forumotion Forums?
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum

